Jim McKay, who once was called by Variety "America's own Ken Loach", responded to my recent email blast and has kindly agreed to go public with it:
"even the A-list auteurs' star-filled agency-backed packages are failing to find US buyers at Cannes"???
I don't see this as cause for alarm, I see this as cause for celebration.
I mean, look at that sentence. What could be more diametrically opposed to small, independent filmmaking than stars, agencies, and packaging?!?
The root of this whole problem goes back to the indie-fication of Hollywood and the fact that small films have found themselves competing with bigger ones for casting, financing, and, worst of all, Oscar recognition. Small films should never have had to compare themselves with these products or compete against them at festivals or in the box office. And yet this is where the "Indie Film" phenomena ultimately landed.
We must stop seeing ourselves through the lens of 1) Hollywood and 2) Indiewood. The first is a system completely outside the realm of what small filmmakers create. The second is actually a non-existent planet that for a small time differentiated itself from Hollywood but is now just a sub-folder. Many of the great American filmmaking veterans, the ones who have spent their careers making small films, exist completely outside these worlds. Rob Nilsson, Jon Jost, Nina Menkes, Victor Nunez, Yvonne Rainer.... Let's start looking at how they do it, comparing the state of things for young filmmakers with the state of things for these makers. We'll probably learn a little about how to create and survive and I bet things will also look a lot more rosy in comparison.....
Let the Cannes/Sundance/Tribeca house burn down.
Or let it just do whatever it's gonna do. But I think we need to stop looking at the bigger system as something that exists in the same universe as films like the ones you listed.
The sky is not falling, the sky is opening up.
We've spent the last ten years eating filet mignon when rice and beans taste just as good. We've been flying first class instead of driving in the van with the band. No shit - steak and warm mixed nuts are lovely. It was nice while it lasted. But things have changed and we can change with them (for most of us, back to the way we always did it in the first place - much more challenging when you start becoming an old fuck like me) or we can just quit or sell out or buy in.
The fact is, now that the economy has crashed people will finally start making films for less money and with less bullshit attached and stop trying to play the Hollywood or, just as bad, Indiewood game. And in the future, just like in the past, really good films will still have a tough time getting made. And getting seen. And making their money back.
But there is one maxim that will never cease to apply: great work will ALWAYS, always find its way. It may not make a lot of money, it may call for extreme or inventive means of distribution, it will almost never be seen by the masses. But great work will continue to be seen and appreciated and maybe now more than ever, the means to spread the word about and gain access to this work is on the brink of discovery.
I know we're saying pretty much the same thing. And I love how you're actually doing something about it. Providing a space for people to share information, taking part in a community.... all this is great and also pretty much all we can do right now as the system makes its seismic shift. While the glass might be half empty of money, I believe it's half full with creativity. Which strikes me as a pretty ridiculously optimistic thing for a cynical guy who hasn't made a feature in 5 years and is coasting into middle-aged curmudgeonhood. And yet, there it is.
keep on keepin' on.
x
Jim
Saturday, May 23, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

7 comments:
This was a great post - thanks for sharing! I remember being in high school when "alternative rock" broke - great bands suddenly had a larger audience, but it disturbed something in the underground. So many bands were trying to sign to a major, or mini-major, which stunted the growth of many and broke up the pockets of regional sounds developing around the country. At the same time, it was that very boom that introduced me to punk rock, indie rock, and in some ways, indie film - so I see the benefit to that. They were the gateway bands. Once that giant went back to rest, the underground could develop in new ways again - and I think that's exciting.
Of course, a similar thing is happening in independent film now - pushed further by the changing models, audiences, and crash of the economy.
I don't want people to lose their jobs certainly don't want anyone to suffer due to it all. However, I agree that there is a creative benefit at the end of all of this: Instead of maxing out 4 credit cards with hopes that their first film will be a Sundance mega-sale, new filmmakers, like myself, have time to find their voices. They have time to explore production models. And they are forced to look at the neighbors in their own community, also struggling, and ask for help, advice, and to step beyond competitive posturing to know each other. That's pretty awesome! And actually fun.
I'm resigned to the fact that filmmaking is unlikely to ever pay my bills. But without that brass ring to catch my eye, I find myself focusing on personal growth and searching for a model where I can pay my bills, have a family, carve out time to improve my craft and realize the stories that get me so excited. I'm psyched to see what comes from this....
Thanks for providing such a great resource for discussion!
Amen, Jim McKay.
I couldn't agree more. I've spent more time than a little challenging the "the sky is falling" attitude that Hollywood, the media and so called indie film festival panels have been shoveling into the mouths of our indie film troops. Simply put, the tide is turning, and it turns in favor of the independent.
See my blog: http://www.angelobell.com/2009/04/hoodwinked-by-hollywood/
The spirit of indie film has always been a DIY thing. We've proven we can make the films without Hollywood, let's now master DIY distribution and prove we can get our films seen...without Cannes, or Sundance the indie arm of a major studio. The path is clear, not bleak. Opportunities abound if we but challenges ourselves to put Hollywood behind us and put our films and our art first.
YES!
Jim touches upon a point we always dance around in this discussion; the WHY of what we do. There are two types of indie filmmakers, the ones who make the films they want to make because they feel they need to be told their way, and the indie filmmakers who make films to use as a jumping point for bigger films. Regardless of the market, these two camps will always exist. They will philosophically and fundamentally impede the other. There is a place for both, but they cloud each other.
Not beat an dead horse with a stick, "Little Miss Sunshine" was labeled an independent film; not an art or specialty film. The line between art & specialty and indie film is blurred every time the mainstream finds itself a big independently financed film with broad appeal. We'll never be able to combat this, (we have to be OK with that. Are we OK with that?) and sometimes, if its our own work, depending on the project, we may not want to. We want our film to reach as big an audience as possible, but not one that won't appreciate it. Its a double edged sword.
The more I think about it, the more I think Jim's response "great work will always find its way" is therapeutic for us. We've been searching for this "new model" for a while, and I believe, as I have always believed, that we, the filmmakers, will find it. We don't know exactly what it is right now and we probably won't for a while, but we know two things for sure; 1. It simple won't be just ONE method of delivery. And 2. The Internet will play a HUGE role.
We need to think about other models than this outdated "hollywood vs guerrilla" one that Jim proposes. It's discouraging that raising a rally cry like that simply causes everyone to jump on board without thinking about the implications.
My understanding of Ted's blog is that he hopes we could rally to create a new model, especially since inaction will re-create the troubles that American independents have had through the past century.
While American filmmakers have done the indie vs Hollywood battle, other countries have created production grants and foreign coproduction agreements to fund and finance quality films with reasonable budgets. American cinema has floundered while the rest of the world has created brilliant and innovative films - why else does Hollywood look to other countries for buying remake rights?
I think the greater point is not, "will great work be seen?" but "can great work be made?"
-Isaac
(a fellow American filmmaker)
Truly valuable insight, for filmmakers, for the health of the artform, and for audiences. Every time we watch another derivative Hollywood "product," we feel in our bones something is amiss. And similarly, when every "indie" film is vying to emulate last year's Sundance sale, the creative growth becomes equally stunted.
After several meetings with producers and distributors regarding my upcoming first feature, I realize they're completely lost--unable to finance Transformers but similarly terrified to make something that doesn't include all the elements on their checklist. All while I'm currently working for free and happy to make the film for $250K.
The results that come from a tremulous "indie" sector are a nothing films, watered down and irrelevant art, and perhaps worst of all, lackluster entertainment. The system is broken, and for the sake of film, I agree, it may truly be a good thing in the end.
Post a Comment